How did evolution happen?

How did evolution happen?

21 answers , last was 14 years ago

Did a fish just wake up one morning with legs and randomly decide to walk out of the ocean, or what? And if they gradually mutated, how? After all, there has to be variation to create new species, so where did this variation come from? All ideas welcome.

Asked by Unknown Brain in Science at 7:13pm on January 15th, 2010
Dillon Campbell New Brain
Answered at 9:37pm on January 21st, 2010
hi
Dave Chambers New Brain
Answered at 7:22pm on January 21st, 2010
Aliens swooped down from planet crapton and well i'll let your mind stink on that a while...
Cameron Trickey 2333
Answered at 2:57pm on January 20th, 2010
Everything evolves, as life necessitates. We happen to be living in a period of relative consistency and so we observe a slower evolution. One may argue that has given rise to the greater evolution of thought, although one could argue equally against such an observation, given our propensity to the distractions that surround us. But despite this general flaw, there are some truly brilliant people among us, and while we quibble on blogs to satisfy our own personal needs, they ponder and solve riddles that few of us have even heard of.

The term 'theory' is generally defined in two ways: 1) 'a formal idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain something' ie a 'fact'; 2) 'your own opinion about it [your theory] which you cannot prove but which you think is true'. It is this latter definition that creationists use to assume a position on the 'theory' of evolution, while science indicates the former. The latter definition should likely be removed as an explanation, better defined as 'proposition', but none of this takes away from the fact that if you have even a basic understanding of the theory of evolution, it is undeniable fact that our, and all nature's lineage, can be traced back along the limbs of evolution. To argue otherwise is to admit ignorance in the argument, and a crossroads for those inspired by faith and those by truth. (I mean no disrespect to anyone by this, just my humble opinion, supported by many 'facts')

But whether we evolved out of the water to escape predators, or if it was to follow the great bounty that lay above, we did in fact come from the water, and the evidence agrees.
Touqir Sajed 1236
Answered at 9:35pm on January 19th, 2010
Mutation is an extremely lengthy process. Protozoa were the first unicellular organism on earth. after that they evolved into more complex multicellular organisms.and after thousands and thousands of years, after millions of series of evolution, we the most complex animals came to life.See, you gave a question saying that "Did a fish just wake up one morning with legs and randomly decide to walk out of the ocean, or what?". the answer is actually no. living organisms can adapt from time to time to a change.you probably have heard that giraffe have evolved from antilope. There necks became long because of their necessity to take food from the large trees. years after years their necks began to grow into what we now know. let me give you another example. we have appendix in our body but it does not have any function and we dont have any necessity to keep it and so after hundreds or thousands of years of evolution we wont be having any appendix in our body. your last question: After all, there has to be variation to create new species, so where did this variation come from?. see, it is the necessity and the act of adapting to the environment. see most bacteria cannot survive in extreme temperature but some can survive even the temperature of volcano. but why?? because they are living around volcano in an environment of extreme heat and in order to adapt to the environment they have created their own protection from the heat. Their enzymes can function even in that extreme temperature. That means they have evolved into more complex bacteria. in this way due to environmental change and necessity, one organism evolves into more complex organisms. Inorder to create another organism, we need the chromosomes of parent organism. when evolution occurs, these information step by step and from time to time gets more complex and they change and we get more complex new organism. people of this century is hundred times more intelligent that the people of 1st century. it is the evolution of the brain!!! so we can expect to get super genius people in the future that awaits for us. for example stephen hawkins-one the of the most famous scientists- extremely super genius. there is a great difference between mutation and evolution. evolution occurs due to the needs the act of adapting to the environment and mutation sometimes occur accidentally and sometimes due to external interference like exposing the gametes to small amounts of gamma ray, the genetic will change. you may have probably heard that a child was born with 6 finger in his hands, this is accidental mutation. the first multicellular organisms had very simple nervous systems without any brain. they could only feel any type of touch and could only respond to it by movement. they could not think. These nervous systems then evolved into more complex ones that we know as brain. our brains have evolved the fastest. i hope this helps you.
Mike Napolitano 1259
Answered at 8:14pm on January 19th, 2010
My view is simple yet not easy to grasp. It is God's plan...call 'God' by whatever name is good for you, we aren't here to discuss which path to follow is correct. But I simply believe that God did not lay all this out for us to follow a predetermined path. More like a Scientist who puts things in motion and lets them happen and then makes adjustments when needed. So what happened is what happened. Things grew and changed, things adapted and evolved due to those growths and changes. Maybe a fish flopped out of the sea to escape a larger fish, and over time that fish and it's family line then learned to stay out longer until they began to breath. That monkey that became man was likely just an odd monkey that tried something different and then passed that along. That hunter that became farmer, those nomads that became city dwellers all tried and succeeded at something new. They also became aware of themselves and the world and so "God" became a thought and image again and personalities were attached depending on region and experiences.

Currently evolution is going on. Birds are learning to fly farther to fewer trees, breathe in more toxic fumes, bugs are growing and changing, mammals too. Reptiles, those animals that seem to change the least are changing too. And we humans need to realize that we don't get to stop the change...we are not bigger than the rest. We can't stop the nature of life. We can't save species and keep the world how it 'is' or 'was' because then no new ones will come along. Someday we humans may be no longer, but currently we are not what we were either...we are stronger, smarter, faster, live longer - we are evolving as well, thank God.
Unknown Brain 1830
Answered at 7:59pm on January 19th, 2010
Alright, I'll explain this to my best.

We've all heard of DNA being referred to as a 'code' of sorts, but it's really more of a factory floor.

Specifically, DNA is 2 long chain of compounds (adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine) connected by 'strings' of sugars and phosphates, joined across the center. The two chains are essentially opposites; adenine on one chain binds to thymine on the other, and the same behaviour between cytosine and guanine.

Each of these compounds is chemically different from one another, and certain compounds will bind to some and not others.

DNA's purpose is simple- to produce proteins. Specifically, the two strands of DNA separate from one another, and a strand of RNA is formed in the rift- RNA is basically similar to DNA, but only with one strand.

The sequence of the compounds I mentioned determines the sequence of compounds on the resulting RNA strand. Amino acids then bind to the active sites on each of those compounds, forming proteins. The type of protein formed is determined by the specific sequence of compounds on the RNA strand, and therefore by the initial sequence in the DNA.

But this process isn't exactly perfect. Numerous things (radiation, presence of other chemicals, even nonstandard temperatures) can alter the process at any step- the actual production of protein can be affected, the transcription of RNA can be affected, or the DNA itself can be altered. It's a chemical reaction, similar to how acids appear to 'eat' metals- the compounds involved are switched out for different chemicals that are also present.

When this occurs when the protein is formed, or the RNA is transcribed, little difference is notable, as the effect is limited to a single strand of protein or a handful of strands.

When this occurs to the DNA itself, it is a mutation, and effects any subsequent protein produced by that strand of DNA.

Just about ANYTHING can be effected by mutation, as the proteins created by DNA form everything our cells are made of, and the behaviour of those cells determine everything- growth rate, hormone production, eye color, you name it.

But this in and of itself does not cause an entire organism to mutate- we're talking about a single strand of dna among many in each individual cell, although certainly the effects shouldn't be discounted altogether- for one, cancer is caused by an alteration of the cells reproductive mechanisms, causing it to divide rapidly, forming a tumor.

Whole organisms mutate generally when the mutation happens to (or is passed to) a sperm or egg, or the stem cells of a developing organism- cases where the altered DNA affects the whole body and not just an individual cell.

In these cases, there are essentially four outcomes.

1- Nothing or neutral. Some mutations have no effect whatsoever, or only change things from an aesthetic standpoint; If a red brick in a building is replaced with a yellow one, the only change is the color of that portion, it is functionally identical. It could even, in this example, just be a slightly different shade of red that isn't even distinguishable from the rest by the naked eye.

2- Beneficial*- The mutation conveys some form of benefit to the organism. Ie. The organism could form denser muscle tissue, giving increased strength and endurance compared to others.

3- Detrimental*- The mutation is somehow harmful to the organism, though not necessarily fatal. Maybe the lenses in the organisms eyes are mishapen ever so slightly and the organisms vision is blurred.

4- Fatal**- The mutation prevents or interferes with some vital function of the organism, causing it to die before it is able to reproduce.


The theory of evolution and natural selection is that an organism with a beneficial mutation will be better able to survive long enough to reproduce and pass its genes on. A detrimental mutation will lower the organisms chance to survive and reproduce succesfully. A fatal mutation will flat out prevent the genes from being passed along.



*- Note that beneficial and detrimental are relative cases, and in terms of evolution, are specific to ability to survive. As an example, the condition of sickle-cell anemia is a genetic trait that weakens the person afflicted. However, people with sickle-cell are resistant to malaria, as the parasite has difficulties surviving in sickle cells. Such things as coloration may not be seen as particularly beneficial or harmful, but in the case of the peppered moth, which has two subspecies, one dark in coloration and one lighter colored, the darker colored moths showed higher survival rates in polluted areas, if only due to being harder to spot by predatory birds.

**- It is also noteworthy that a number of genetic conditions can become fatal at some point, but the 'bar' as it were is survival to reproductive age and succesful reproduction. This can be seen in a number of organisms wherein reproduction itself is fatal to one or both of the parents- while this adaptation is fatal to the organism, they've already passed on their genes at that point, so it's not fatal in terms of reproduction.


Evolution itself is essentially an aggregation of traits beneficial to succesful reproduction that are passed on over time.
Unknown Brain 1212
Answered at 7:09pm on January 19th, 2010
As competition is high for food in the water, fish often try to hop onto land and move themselves and maneuver with their fins. Over time, animals with fins more suited to be on land took over the land more, because they were more fit for land. Gradually, these fins developed into arms because slight genetic variations caused differences in offspring. Offspring with genetic variations that provided beneficial structures and proteins survived better on land.
Sammy Phua 1957 Funny Brain
Answered at 4:58pm on January 19th, 2010
This is the perfect answer...all should watch this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faRlFsYmkeY
haha-check out moe evolving backwards... haha.

Anyway, I believe it is survival of the fittest. Eg, male guppies are brightly coloured to attract their mate, but when predation is high, male guppies adapt the same colour as their surroundings as camouflage...Likewise, elephants who have massive trunks dominate the animal kingdom, but when hunters started hunting them down for ivory, the trunks became shorter. In a human persepective, if ALL food were to be grown on high tress, I believe one day, we will need to adapt to the environment, by either, having stronger legs to jump higher, better biomechanical climbing structures on our feet to climb trees, grow taller... etc. You get my point. Do rememeber that in evolution, especially when comparing humans and monkeys...monkeys are not our grandparents...we share a common ancestor. - Richard dawkins ( the greatest show on earth ). The problem is that people tend to question "the missing link" and sadly enough, when a link has been found (regardless of what animal), instead of solving one gap, history deniers tend to say, " See, there are now 2 gaps, before and after the missing link that has been found..." so it will never end. Likewise if we go into bacteria, experiments have been done to prove that limiting the food source for bacteria growth, over 20 years, bacteria mutates so much so that can use another chemical for its source of nutrition as compared to the initial petri dish, which couldnt survive long.
Sue Williams New Brain
Answered at 11:35am on January 19th, 2010
The fish became a human being first and THEN walked out of the ocean.
Unknown Brain 2141
Answered at 9:34am on January 19th, 2010
Proteins floated around and combined, and if they survived, they replicated, then the replicated ones replicated more and combined more until over many billions of years, a cell was evolved, then the cell evolved more and over many more billions of years, we evolved, the end.
Load more
There are no debates yet! To start one, click "Debate this answer!" under someone's answer.
There are no debates yet! To start one, click "Debate this answer!" under someone's answer.