How do you explain dinosaurs in christianity?

How do you explain dinosaurs in christianity?

14 answers , last was 15 years ago

Evolution teaches that dinosaurs roamed the earth before man.

Asked by Anonymous in Religion & Spirituality at 1:28am on March 6th, 2008
Ed Shanley 1643
Answered at 6:03pm on March 29th, 2009
assuming God is all powerful..couldn't he make anything apear older than it is? Put fossils and such in places to apear millions of years old? So maybe he did that and it is a test. Believe your eyes or your faith.
Laura Smith 2366
Answered at 6:56am on April 15th, 2008
obviously humans were not around then so they could not have been recorded, we musn't forget that men wrote the bible. Secondly, the metaphor for 7 days of creation; we have to realize that it could have been alot longer than seven actual days for God to create the earth... with that in mind it could have been that to him 1 million years equaled one day. Man was created last. That gave plenty of time for dinosaurs to roam the earth and become extinct before God decided he didn't want them around anymore. Just a theory.
Matthew Chasco 1298
Answered at 6:36pm on April 8th, 2008
You say that the bible called them "dragons" and pull some other bullshit out of your ass. Then when people show you carbon or radiometric dating data, just say that those methods don't work, or that "science is wrong".
John Supp 2272
Answered at 3:15pm on April 4th, 2008
Good question. I personally subscribe to an interesting, yet somewhat complex theory that does explain dinosaurs, Noah's flood, and apparent age descrepancies all at once. It's long, so bear with me. When describing creation and Noah's flood, the Bible makes reference to waters of the heavens. Obviously this became the rain, but where did enough rain come from to fall for forty days and forty nights, worldwide? The answer is the antedeluvian (pre-flood) canopy. Basically, it was a pretty thick cloud cover over the entire planet. It let enough light through to allow plants to live, but kept out the more harmful cosmic radiation, like UV rays and such. Now, it is theorized that the outer shell of this canopy, being exposed to basically hard space, would have frozen. This would also lead to a pressurization of the inside atmosphere to about twice the pressure we have today. Interestingly, studies performed on plants and animals inside hyperbaric (high-pressure) chambers have shown them to grow to amazing size. In one of these studies, single tomato plant yielded over 100 tomatoes. Also interesting, based on the skeletons of dinosaurs, we can extrapolate the necessary size of their organs in order to support such a creature. As it happens, dinosaurs would not have had the lung capacity to breath an atmosphere as thin as our own. However, double the pressure, and the lungs can come down to a reasonable enough size to allow for the other organs to fit. Those creatures in the hyperbaric chambers, they also lived significatly longer than those species normally do. Another interesting side effect of living at 2 atm pressure, the blood gets saturated with oxygen and lactic acid doesn't build up in the muscles nearly as fast. This means that you could run at a rather fast pace for a very long time before needing to rest. Combine that with the size factor (Adam was believed to be about ten feet tall, and capable of jogging at more than forty mph), and you could take an afternoon jog to grandma's house...eighty miles away. So, if you combine these factors, no harmful cosmic rays, twice the air to breath, it's not all that far fetched that the dinosaurs were created as the Old Testament says, and that they simply couldn't survive the collapse of the antedeluvian canopy and the lower pressure atmosphere it created.
Now, regarding geologic time, there are plenty of episodes even in modern history of very rapid geological change. The eruption of Mt. St. Helens was a case study in rapid climate change. It had an horrific effect on the local geography in a matter of hours and days, not millions of years. It even lowered global temperatures a degree or two due to the massive amounts of ash it blew into the air. Krakatoa did a similar thing when it created the "year without summer". Basic point, geology can change a lot faster than evolutionists are willing to admit, besides all the other evidence for why the earth might be more than ten thousand years old, but can't possibly be millions. My favorite is the shrinkage rate of the sun. Did you know that, due to the fact that it's a huge hydrogen bomb, the sun is constantly losing massive amounts of, well, mass. Astronomers have actually measured it's rate of shrinkage to be approximately four feet a second. At this rate, all else being equal, the suun would have been as big as earth's orbit only a few million years ago, not hundreds or thousands. Anyway, sorry it's so long, but a theory as complex as this one doesn't make much sense if it's condensed much further. For more info on young-earth science, search for a man named Dr. McMurtry. He knows this stuff a lot better than me.
David Souza 2399 Brainpower Score
Answered at 12:37pm on April 3rd, 2008
I don't really see why one would interefere with the other. Dinosaurs existed a loooooooooooooooong time ago, Christianity started about less than 2000 years ago. Besides the Christianity is not about archeology or biology.

Some people start interpreting the bible in their own way and stating their interpretations as the truth. Who the hell knows the truth anyway?

I always say this: God gave us brains so we would use them. Let's not disappoint him, shall we?

This was an interesting text taken about evolution and God from Answers.com:
There is nothing in evolution that would lead to the conclusion that there is no God, that the universe is not God's handiwork, or that God does not continue to engage in a personal relationship with each human. Neither is there anything in evolution that would lead to the conclusion that God does exist. Rather, the matter of God is simply not relevant to the questions addressed by evolution. In other words, evolution leaves spiritual belief where it should be (at least, according to Christianity): in the realm of individual choice.
Michael Plumb 1667
Answered at 5:55pm on March 9th, 2008
I don't think many Christians have a problem with dinosaurs. As a matter of fact, the dinosaurs were gone long before any Christians (or Christ, for that matter) showed up on the scene.
Now you might have been referring to the apparent discrepancy between the timeline of creation in the Bible when compared to that of fossil records. The old testament (which is the basis for more religions than just Christianity) says the world and all the animals were created in just a few days, yet the fossil records indicate it took millions of years. Most religions and all serious scholars agree that the Bible includes some things that cannot be interpreted literally. The six day creation story is one of those things.
Joey Clark 1976
Answered at 4:46am on March 9th, 2008
I don't understand why Christians can't accept dinosaurs? There are plenty of Christians who don't own slaves, stone adulterous wives, or work on the Sabbath. So I'm sure we can let Dinosaurs slide.
Ian McGinthy 1416
Answered at 9:04am on March 8th, 2008
if you know the story of creation than you would know that the dinosaurs were created before man when God created all the other animals. and the reason that they are no longer alive is because of the great flood. the flood changed so much in the atmosphere making it impossible for the dinosaurs to live.
Desmon Dunn 1950
Answered at 10:24pm on March 7th, 2008
they are jesus horses
Brent Bejot 1495
Answered at 1:52pm on March 7th, 2008
My opinion is that dinosaurs have never existed as anything but bones and oil. It's totally possible (and seems to be the most probable to me) that God created many things with an apparent history. Just take stars, if one believes in any sort of creation, then he must have created the stars with an apparent history as we are still seeing the light of stars that have died many tens of thousands of years ago.

Side note, Tammy, to believe that the KJV is the only and best translation is naive - we known much more today about translating Greek and Hebrew than they did when the KJV was translated. The best a translation can do is to come as close as possible to the meaning of the original text, which the KJV does not do for the modern English speakers.
Load more
There are no debates yet! To start one, click "Debate this answer!" under someone's answer.
There are no debates yet! To start one, click "Debate this answer!" under someone's answer.